Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/87754
Title: | The constitutional restrictions of human rights in Mexico from the contradiction of thesis 293/11. argumentative analysis and weighting assessment for the solution of normative principles in conflict Las restricciones constitucionales de los derechos humanos en México a partir de la contradicción de tesis 293/11, análisis argumentativo y valoración ponderativa para la solución de principios normativos en conflicto |
Keywords: | Constitutional Justice;Weighting;Humans rights;Justicia constitucional;Ponderación;Derechos humanos |
Publisher: | Universidad de Guadalajara |
Description: | The study of judicial decisions is of great importance within the current era, it is there where the legal reasoning that resolves controversial cases are represented, especially those of higher instances of delivery of justice, one of those cases is the contradiction of thesis 293/11, which in Mexico refers to the restriction of human rights, jurisprudential criterion that we try to analyze from the perspective of legal argumentation. El estudio de las resoluciones judiciales es de gran importancia dentro de la época actual, es ahí donde se representan los razonamientos jurídicos que resuelven casos controvertidos, sobre todo aquellos de instancias superiores de impartición de justicia, uno de esos casos es la contradicción de tesis 293/11, que en México refiere a la restricción de los derechos humanos, criterio jurisprudencial que tratamos de analizar desde la óptica de la argumentación jurídica. |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/87754 |
Other Identifiers: | http://www.derechoglobal.cucsh.udg.mx/index.php/DG/article/view/323 10.32870/dgedj.v6i16.323 |
Appears in Collections: | Revista Derecho Global |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in RIUdeG are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.