Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/83289
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMejía-Reyes, Pablo-
dc.creatorDíaz-Carreño, Miguel Ángel-
dc.date2016-01-19-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-14T19:26:31Z-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-14T22:06:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-14T19:26:31Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-14T22:06:07Z-
dc.identifierhttps://econoquantum.cucea.udg.mx/index.php/EQ/article/view/4859/6273-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/83289-
dc.descriptionThis paper investigates the effects of a battery of variables on total and sector output drops in the Mexican states during the Great Recession by estimating spatial and cross-section regression models. Our main results can be summarized as follows. First, there is evidence of spatial autocorrelation only in the case of total production and it seems to be negative, which does not support the hypothesis of interstate transmission of the recession. Second, total and sector production falls can be explained by the specialization in the production of tradable (mainly durable) goods. Third, exposure to external shocks plays an important role in the cases of industrial and services production, but not in total output. Fourth, there seems to be that federal fiscal policy has actually been pro-cyclical while state fiscal policies have contributed to mitigate the recession. en-US
dc.descriptionThis paper investigates the effects of a battery of variables on total and sector output drops in the Mexican states during the Great Recession by estimating spatial and cross-section regression models. Our main results can be summarized as follows. First, there is evidence of spatial autocorrelation only in the case of total production and it seems to be negative, which does not support the hypothesis of interstate transmission of the recession. Second, total and sector production falls can be explained by the specialization in the production of tradable (mainly durable) goods. Third, exposure to external shocks plays an important role in the cases of industrial and services production, but not in total output. Fourth, there seems to be that federal fiscal policy has actually been pro-cyclical while state fiscal policies have contributed to mitigate the recession. es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherUniversidad de Guadalajaraes-ES
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2016 EconoQuantumes-ES
dc.source2007-9869-
dc.source1870-6622-
dc.sourceEconoQuantum; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 Segundo semestre 2015 Second semester; 25-45en-US
dc.sourceEconoQuantum; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 Segundo semestre 2015 Second semester; 25-45es-ES
dc.subjectRegional Business Cyclesen-US
dc.subjectGreat Recessionen-US
dc.subjectSpatial Regressionen-US
dc.subjectE32en-US
dc.subjectF44en-US
dc.subjectC21en-US
dc.subjectRegional Business Cycleses-ES
dc.subjectGreat Recessiones-ES
dc.subjectSpatial Regressiones-ES
dc.subjectE32es-ES
dc.subjectF44es-ES
dc.subjectC21es-ES
dc.titleEffects of the Great Recession on state output in Mexicoen-US
dc.titleEffects of the Great Recession on state output in Mexicoes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Appears in Collections:Revista Econoquantum

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in RIUdeG are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.